|
Post by Wß on Oct 7, 2016 20:30:48 GMT
The FiA is that insidiously powerful?
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 7, 2016 20:45:35 GMT
Oh! I didn't mean the FIA, I meant the FBI. I can't remember acronyms. Always mix them up.
|
|
ichabod
Full Member
Posts: 183
Likes: 147
|
Post by ichabod on Oct 7, 2016 20:57:56 GMT
Well maybe theFIA will kill her like they did Kennedy . And Marilyn Monroe. Maybe they'll kill Trup if he gets in too. Let's hope it's a draw and the FBI kill them both
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 8, 2016 7:52:25 GMT
Have you seen this video? Or rather have you heard it? Even more bizarre is that somewhere It says Trump recorded it!
|
|
|
Post by Hammer on Oct 8, 2016 11:57:53 GMT
There we go, the first of the 'ace of spades' on Hillarys camp. They could've released this a lot earlier, but then people might forget come election time. Let's see if there's any response from Donald Duck's side, maybe a video of Hillary cheating on Bill. I see some rumours of Hillary actually saying "I'm not like the middle class, I'm in another league" in private quarters - which were part of those classified emails which were deleted.
The real ugliness will be saved for the month before elections.
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 8, 2016 13:04:21 GMT
Was it Hilary Clinton that released that video? Trump recorded it. He's wanting to be president. What's he doing acting like a randy teenager and recording it? If Hilary did release it, what'sche doing giving her these opportunities? What opportunities will his lack of discretion give others in more potent situations if he becomes president. Don't a lot of bible bashers vote Trump? Wonder what they think.
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 8, 2016 13:21:01 GMT
In the mean time, we have no idea where Hillary stands on issues like the Oklahoma pipeline and the thousands of native Americans opposed to it being built in their territory. She's being given a free pass by the media because the ratings are higher when they talk about T.Rump.
|
|
|
Post by Hammer on Oct 10, 2016 6:09:42 GMT
"Because you'd be in jail". LOL
|
|
|
Post by Hammer on Oct 10, 2016 6:13:22 GMT
Was it Hilary Clinton that released that video? Trump recorded it. He's wanting to be president. What's he doing acting like a randy teenager and recording it? If Hilary did release it, what'sche doing giving her these opportunities? What opportunities will his lack of discretion give others in more potent situations if he becomes president. Don't a lot of bible bashers vote Trump? Wonder what they think. Well I'm sure it wasn't her personally, but one of her campaign "sh!t hunters". Both sides have them, but it feels like Hillary's side works harder at it. Anyway, I think this campaign is done and dusted. Trump was too weak in the 2nd debate, he looked almost victimized throughout and he kept going on and on like a broken record. The Republicans gave the Presidency on a platter to Grinning Hillary by voting Trump in.
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 10, 2016 7:02:52 GMT
I've read it was Hilary's lot that released the video. Apparently they sat on it for ten years waiting for an opportune time to release it. I didn't realise it was from ten years ago, doesn't excuse it though. She released it to counteract the damage from wilileeks. Wikileeks are going to drop feed more infor about her bit by bit.
I've nit seen the second debate yet.
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 10, 2016 11:49:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 10, 2016 23:45:22 GMT
I love this.
|
|
|
Post by Hammer on Oct 11, 2016 0:22:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 11, 2016 8:42:07 GMT
WB ( can't remember your @) I have a question for you. Let me start by saying that this is not in any way showing any support for Hilary Clinton, because I don't like her. She's a smug git.......gitess?
Anyway. The question is...what is the illegal thing she's done? I know she got her email accounts mixed up. But I do that with my Twitter accounts. Isn't that just stupid but not illegal? So she must have done something else other than get her email accounts mixed up. I know she's in cahoots with big corporations and she's corrupt. But what is the illegal thing she's done?
|
|
|
Post by Hammer on Oct 11, 2016 12:04:01 GMT
WB ( can't remember your @) I have a question for you. Let me start by saying that this is not in any way showing any support for Hilary Clinton, because I don't like her. She's a smug git.......gitess? Anyway. The question is...what is the illegal thing she's done? I know she got her email accounts mixed up. But I do that with my Twitter accounts. Isn't that just stupid but not illegal? So she must have done something else other than get her email accounts mixed up. I know she's in cahoots with big corporations and she's corrupt. But what is the illegal thing she's done?
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 11, 2016 12:12:26 GMT
The very act of using an email server that's not the one provided by her state department office is illegal. Now why would someone want to use a separate email server? There's a few likely answers to that but they all revolve around mistrust and lack of transparency so I won't bother with them. The point is that when a entity like the DOJ subpoenas you, you're supposed to hand over the things you're being subpoenaed for. She didn't, she went on to delete thousands upon thousands (30~35K) by estimates of emails saying they were all private in nature emails between her and her family. Now why she wouldn't hand them over is beyond me, but then again we see that no one... and I mean no one, even her current campaign manager trusts her to be honest and truthful. He's on record of saying just that about her when he was working for Bill Clinton in the White House. What does this say about Hillary? Well, there's a reason why her and Trump have the highest unfavorability rating of any presidential candidates that have come before them. Think about that, they are the least favorable candidates EVER. In Hillary's defense is the fact that other previous secretary of defense secretaries have had email communications outside of proper channels, some have had no issues (I guess they weren't subpoenaed in the first place) other federal officials have lost their jobs and been prosecuted for it. Illegal, probably yes, but it's illegal for cops to murder unarmed civilians too... so the question is not whether or no it's illegal. The question or not is whether or not they get prosecuted. She didn't, in the same way most cops don't. At this point my analogy of the current election is giving a starving man a shit sandwich. He'll probably wipe the shit off as best he can and eat the slices of bread.
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 11, 2016 12:24:06 GMT
I'll add one thing. Hillary has a history of saying one thing publicly and doing another thing privately. It's the core issue that surrounds her and it's why she's so untrusted by large swathes of the American electorate, myself included. In the massive hack that Wiki Leaks has been sharing bit and pieces of over the last few months there's been the following;
1) Allegations that her campaign colluded with the DNC to tip the balance of the elections in her favor. They denied it, and the emails prove it to be true.
2) Allegations of political commitments broken, for example, telling the American electorate that she's against fracking and certain trade agreements, where internal communications leaked show her lobbying for the vote of influential senators to support both causes.
3) These latest rounds of emails show excerpts and commentary of the transcripts to Wall Street speeches where she's cheerleeding and saying she's god the backs of the institutions that effectively caused the financial meltdown of 2008/2009. They're the ones that have supported her most ardently both personally through he Clinton foundation and paid speeches and professionally through campaign contributions.
|
|
|
Post by racechick on Oct 11, 2016 13:52:31 GMT
I see. So it wasn't her just being naive and using wrong email account. It was all devious . What desperate situation....her or Trump.
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 11, 2016 14:48:38 GMT
Shit sandwich.
|
|
|
Post by Wß on Oct 22, 2016 13:26:44 GMT
my feelings exactly.
|
|